North Curtin residential development proposal suggestions for submissions – close 18 June

Here are our suggested points to help make submissions on the North Curtin residential proposal for 1,300 dwellings on the eastern (Yarra Glen) side of the horse paddocks area. The western side is intended for diplomatic developments.

Points for submissions about the North Curtin Residential Area

To make a submission by Tuesday 18 June 2024, email EPSDDcomms@act.gov.au

Planning must foster the creation of a community rather than simply focus on the number of dwellings.

Given the position of the site within its broader urban context and the problems to be solved to create a workable community, including access and the need for on-site shops, services and community facilities, the proposed number of dwellings (approximately 1,300) and number of people (approximately 2,500) are too high.

A medium, rather than high, density development would be a significant densification project for Canberra and a major contribution to the ACT’s need for housing.

A medium density development – one with a dwelling and population density similar to Braddon or Kingston – would be a significant densification project for Canberra and a major contribution to the ACT’s need for housing (as identified in the ACT Housing Choices report).

A new residential suburb but not being planned as one

The planned population of about 2,500 people is 80% of the population of the adjacent suburbs of Yarralumla to the north and Deakin to the west and 45% of Curtin to the south.  (Curtin is a ‘double suburb’ in the size of its population and its area.)  So, the planned population of the new North Curtin Residential Area is equivalent to a new residential suburb.

(The population of nearby suburbs from the 2021 census is: Curtin: 5,569 people; Hughes: 3,210; Deakin 3,124; and, Yarralumla 3,120.)

Consequently, planning for the development of the new North Curtin Residential Area must be done in the same way as for establishing a new residential suburb in Canberra.  This will include a planning for:

  • a range of local community facilities
  • roads and traffic, particularly impact on nearby roads which are already congested
  • walkability – pedestrian and cycle paths within the area and connectivity with surrounding areas and public transport
  • diversity of housing choices
  • “green” open space, both public and private, and tree canopy cover

However, this not happening.  So, for example, it must not be assumed that the demands of such a large number of people can be added to existing retail, services and education infrastructure in Curtin or Yarralumla. There must be some local facilities within walking distance of the new residences.

Very constrained access by vehicles, pedestrians and active wheeled travel

The new North Curtin Residential Area is essentially inaccessible from two sides and access is very constrained from the other two sides.

  • To the east no access is permitted from Yarra Glen (a condition from the National Capital Plan).
  • Yarralumla Creek is the southern boundary.
  • The planned Diplomatic Estate is on the western boundary.
  • Cotter Road, a very busy road that’s already congested during peak hour, is the northern boundary.

These constraints on access mean that this relatively small area of 13.1 hectares is not suitable for housing the large number of people (about 2,500) proposed in the current development plan as a large number of people will be moving in and out of a relatively small area via very limited connections to existing infrastructure.  This problem will be particularly acute at peak hour – morning and evening.

Planning for the new residential area must include reasonably direct connections – not dog-legged, winding pathways – to one or both of Curtin group centre or Yarralumla local centre for (segregated) pedestrian and active wheeled travel, as well as car travel.

Access to existing and new public transport on Cotter Rd and Yarra Glen must be made a priority in planning the area not left to be an emergent, second-class outcome of the development. Additional local bus services must be considered.

The large number of people and high population density proposed for new North Curtin Residential Area must be discussed now, so that development can be planned in a holistic way.

The planned population density for the north Curtin site (approximately 19,000 people per sq km) is almost 4 times higher than Braddon and Kingston – the Canberra suburbs with the highest population density – and about the same as Chippendale and Haymarket – the areas of Sydney with the highest population density.

(ACT areas with the highest density at June 2023 were:

  • Kingston (5,100 people per sq km)
  • Braddon (5,000)

NSW: The areas with the highest density at June 2023 were:

  • Sydney (South) – Haymarket (21,000 people per sq km)
  • Chippendale (20,000), to the south of Sydney’s city centre)

The 1,300 dwellings proposed by the ACT Government and the number of people this translates to would result in a high population density. This is presented as a predetermined choice made by the ACT Government.  There are consequences of this choice that must be discussed now, so that the new North Curtin development can be planned in a holistic way.

Traffic congestion, unsustainable pressure on existing facilities and an urban heat island

Some of the consequences of the large number of people and high population density are:

Roads and traffic congestion

 A large number of people would be moving in and out of a relatively small area, especially at peak hour.  Existing surrounding roads – Cotter Road, McCulloch St, Dudley St, Kent St and Yarra Glen – are already congested.  The proposed development would make a bad situation worse.

The “Mint Interchange” needs to be built so that traffic can flow from Cotter Road on to Yarra Glen towards Woden and traffic coming from the south can flow from Yarra Glen on to Cotter Road.

Traffic modelling undertaken for the Canberra Brickworks redevelopment by AECOM and SMEC in 2012-13 demonstrated that a major interchange “The Mint Interchange” will be required to provide access to the West Deakin commercial centre to prevent the roads from being overwhelmed, light rail notwithstanding. The ACT Government advised at the time that the construction of the interchange would be considered in the planning for Stage2B of Light Rail from Civic to Woden.

The additional number of people using Cotter Rd from this development makes implementing this improved interchange an essential precondition, not an afterthought. Traffic must be able to flow on to Yarra Glen towards Woden, as well as on to Adelaide Avenue towards the Inner South and Civic, and traffic coming from the south can flow from Yarra Glen on to Cotter Road.

Local facilities

Existing retail, services and education infrastructure in Curtin or Yarralumla are already heavily used, with parking at the Curtin and Yarralumla shops already difficult. There must be some local facilities within walking distance of the new residences.  Also, a major advantage of high population density is ‘walkability’, the ability to walk to a diverse range of local facilities, as in Chippendale, for example

The demographic of the people in the new residential area must also be taken into account now.  On current plans most households in the new North Curtin Residential Area would be couples without children or a single person.  This demographic has a distinct demand for facilities within walking distance within the development area that has to be incorporated in planning.

Urban heat island and water runoff

The large number of dwellings planned for the site, combined with the fact that most of the area is already a heat island, mean that it is essential to avoid the creation of an urban heat island with all the adverse consequences it would create for residents’ well-being.  Tree canopy cover in residential areas needs to be greater than 40% in order to provide cooling during the hottest part of the day when people are most vulnerable to the adverse health impact of urban heat islands.

The large number of dwellings planned for the site would also increase runoff from this area by adding buildings, roads and pavement.  This would increase run-off during rain and studies will be needed to manage flooding in Yarralumla Creek.  This is an opportunity to start naturalising the Yarralumla Creek. Despite the potential for heavy rainfall in its catchment, this should be no harder than naturalising Sullivan’s Creek. Doing so would open recreation space for the new residents and create a blue-green wildlife corridor between Red Hill and the Molonglo River valley.

Overall, the trade-off between hard surfaces (buildings, roads, pavement) and soft, permeable (‘green’) open space is critical and should be discussed now rather than left to be an emergent outcome of the development.

Not family-friendly

The 1,300 dwellings proposed for the 13.1 hectare area of the new North Curtin Residential Area will discriminate against households with children; that is, it is not ‘family-friendly’.

During his interview on ABC Radio Canberra on 8th May, Jeremy Smith, Executive Group Manager in the ACT’s Planning Directorate, said that the typology of housing planned for the new North Curtin Residential Area would result in on average about 1.7 people per dwelling.  Existing ACT suburbs with this number of people per household are Braddon and Kingston, both with 1.8 people per household (from the 2021 census).  So, the typology of housing planned for the new North Curtin Residential Area can be expected to be similar to that in Braddon and Kingston and result in relatively few dwellings being suitable for families with children.

(From the 2021 census Canberra as a whole has 1 child/household; Braddon has 0.1 children/household; Kingston has 0.2 children/household.)

Even so, the current plan would result in an additional 250 children requiring child care and primary schools. Primary school growth in North Woden is planned to be in Garran, way beyond walking or cycling distance for a child of primary-school age, and will result in increased traffic flow from the area towards Woden.

Not consistent with the National Capital Plan

The new North Curtin Residential Area is part of the Curtin Diplomatic Precinct and so is designated land within the National Capital Plan.  Consequently, development must satisfy the objectives for designated land.  These include that planning must provide a landscape response which supports the image of a garden city of national and international significance.

This objective can be met by buildings of a height up to 3 to 4 storeys as this is typically not greater than the height of the mature tree canopy.  The current plan, which is dominated by 6 and 9 storey buildings, does not meet this ‘garden city’ objective.

An opportunity for the ACT Government

The new North Curtin Residential Area is an excellent opportunity to create a medium density precinct – one with a dwelling and population density that’s similar to Braddon, which is on a light-rail corridor, or Kingston – that delivers on two key planning priorities for Canberra:

  • Plan for more housing in and around key precincts, shops and rapid transport connections.
  • Enable diverse housing choices and increase the number of dwellings in the missing middle, such as townhouses, terrace homes and low-rise apartment living.

A medium density development would be a significant densification project for Canberra and a major contribution to the ACT’s need for housing (as identified in the ACT Housing Choices report).  It would demonstrate that densification can occur in a way that:

  • is ‘family-inclusive’; and,
  • does not create urban heat islands with their adverse consequences for equity and well-being of Canberrans.

The new North Curtin Residential Area can also be a showcase example of high class planning and development under the view of Canberra’s diplomatic community.

 

Comments called for north Curtin residential development

The ACT government has a call for comments on its Your Say site
on the proposal to develop 1,300 dwellings on its part of the north Curtin horse paddocks site.
The larger part of the site is reserved for future diplomatic estate to be planned by the National Capital Authority.

Comments close on 11 June. See the Your Say website for details.

Chris Johnson presented a summary of the main issues (PDF) at the WVCC meeting on Weds 1 May.

The Government says it wants to hear about

  • The variety and size of housing types
  • Type and scale of public open spaces
  • Landscape design options
  • Opportunities for supporting land uses within the residential area, such as cafes, small scale retail and community facilities
  • Planning for sustainability and climate resilience
  • Transport and access

but the survey restricts you to multiple choice replies on some of these.

Our quick summary response

  • This proposal is for very dense housing: it packs the population of a suburb into a small area
  • It needs to be planned as a new suburb, not as an extension that depends on existing services
  • The light rail as it is being planned does not provide any service to this development

See the pdf link above for our comments on

Numbers • Transport • Education • Green environment • Housing types

and see this our media release calling for a pause in the call for comments until more information is provided

MEDIA RELEASE North Curtin 3 times as dense as Singapore with no facilities

Public Meeting 18 February 2024: dementia village and election issues

Woden Uniting Church Hall     3pm Sunday 18 February

For members and the general community:
the Curtin Residents Association ran a public community meeting on Sunday 18th February
at the Woden Uniting Church hall on Gillies St.

for everyone interested in the ongoing development of Curtin and its services and infrastructure.
There were two topics:

1. The proposed village-style dementia facility to be built at the old North Curtin Primary School site on Carruthers St (where the Emergency Services Agency was based).
The Suburban Land Agency is handling the tender process for the development. The SLA was be at our meeting to present information on the development and their progress with community consultation.

2. Ideas ahead of the 2024 ACT elections: we want to hear what issues you suggest the CRA should advocate to candidates in this 2024 election year.

Copies of the presentations at Public Meeting and AGM 26 Nov 2023

Here are the slide shows that were presented at the public meeting and AGM on 26 November 2023 in PDF.

This includes

 

Public meeting and AGM Sunday 26 November 2023

The Annual General Meeting and a public meeting will be held on Sunday 26 November

The AGM starts 3pm, public meeting at 3.30. Woden Uniting Church, Gillies St, Curtin.

  • AGM agenda: reports and elections. 3pm
    • nominations for office bearers and committee members will be accepted at the meeting,
      or up until midnight Saturday 25 Nov by email or on paper:
      print a form from here: Committee nomination form 22Nov23
  • Refreshments tea, coffee, cakes from 3.15pm
  • public meeting 3.30pm
    • brief on current issues
      • ACT and NCA planning, North Curtin residential area (horse paddocks)
      • the Wesley Mission proposal for supported housing on the Block
      • areas identified for infill in the Woden District Strategy
      • nature reserve in Curtin Park (Illoura horse area)
    • a longer presentation from the Suburban Land Authority on the village-style dementia facility that is planned for the site of the North Curtin primary school.

 

Submissions and comments on the ACT Planning Review

The ACT Government planning review closed for comments on 3 March.

Here is the Curtin Residents Association Submission (with corrections).

If you would like to have your own submission published here please send as an email attachment to info@curtinresidents.asn.au

The government has published 80 written submissions from across Canberra at https://yoursayconversations.act.gov.au/act-planning-review under the heading Written Submissions, which is found about one third down the page.

All our recommended comments

these were published and put into Curtin letterboxes before submissions closed

Links to the draft plans and strategies

http://yoursayconversations.act.gov.au/act-planning-review/provide-feedback

Submissions Handout and Public meeting Saturday 25 August

Handout For Submissions – for a copy of the meeting handout How to make a submission and points to make 

handout – click here 


Public Meeting

2pm Saturday 25 August 2018

St James Uniting Church hall, Gillies Street, Curtin

The developer of the fenced-off site on Curtin Square has lodged an application to reconsider a revised development application (DA).

The proposed building is a variation on the plans rejected 18 months ago.

Come along to hear about the revised DA, show your concern, make your views known, and hear how to make a submission to ACT Planning

The facts

  • ACT Planning is reconsidering a major revision of the DA for 45 Curtin Place that was rejected 18 months ago, under rules intended for minor revisions.
  • The Curtin Master Plan has been in draft (2016), revised (May 2018) and should be finalised by the end of 2018.

We say

  • We object to the process of reconsidering an application that has changed a lot, when we do not know whether it will be evaluated against the old precinct rules, the draft Master Plan, the revised Master Plan—or the yet‑to‑be‑seen final Master Plan.
  • The proposed building is still too big. It will loom over neighbouring low buildings. Its 5-storey part encroaches onto the area that the revised Master Plan restricts to one storey to preserve sunshine in the Square and keep the ‘urban village’ character of the shopping centre.
  • The traffic and service trucks for the proposed building conflict with pedestrians and parking.
  • The ACT Government has put in a lot of effort to consult the community so far—it now has to enforce its planning rules to keep the community’s trust.
  • We are not against development, but this one is still not right for the Square.

media release 5 August: Curtin surprised by application to reconsider failed development proposal in Curtin shops

The President of the Curtin Residents Association, Chris Johnson, said “I am surprised – and staggered – by the unexpected submission of a modified proposal to redevelop the building at 44 Curtin Place. Thisnew proposal was submitted to ACTPLA as a request to reconsider the development application that was rejected by ACT Planning and Land Authority nearly 18 months ago.  Normally, any request for reconsideration must be submitted within three weeks of the decision and only involve small changes.”

The decision to accept this application for reconsideration is totally inconsistent with a trustworthy public planning and development process,”said Mr Johnson.

The new proposal is for a block of one storey on the western edge of the Curtin square, extending to 5 storeys at the corner.  It is very different from the original development application. Therefore, in keeping with its own planning processes, ACTPLA must provide a reasonable opportunity for the community to respond to this new development proposal.

The developer has submitted their new proposal just before the new Curtin Master Plan is to be finalised along with the likely introduction of new planning rules. The developers cannot know what the final Master Plan and these planning rules will be and ACTPLA should not have accepted any request for reconsideration like this.  ACTPLA should certainly not try to assess any development proposals until the latest version of the Master Plan is made public and after subsequent comments have been received and properly considered.

The first community consultations about the Curtin Group Centre were held in 2015 and in the first draft master plan was developed soon after.  In early 2017, more than 700 people rallied in Curtin Square and nearly 2,000 people from Curtin and surrounding suburbs signed a petition to the ACT Minister for Planning to ask that no development applications should be considered until the Master Plan was made final.  After the first development application was rejected the government asked all parties to participate in meetings of a community panel, which resulted in a revised master plan for Curtin.  This revision was published for public comment in May and June 2018, and the final result has not yet been made public for approval by the Legislative Assembly or the Minister. It is expected by the end of 2018.

Only last week, the ACT Government stated in its Our Canberra brochure that the “Master Plan for the Curtin Group Centre is almost finished”.  Mr Johnson stated that “Any move to reconsider a development proposal before the Plan is finalised will kill any trust in the Government’s planning process that has been built up by the long community consultation process.”

The developer’s reconsideration application allows only 3 weeks for comments [since extended, to 11 September]. “If the process of writing the new master plan had made no progress for the past two years this might be a good way to speed up development of replacement shops in Curtin.  But the Master Plan is still being developed and, although the process is slow, it is close to being finished. There is no good public reason to reconsider this application in this way. The developer should not be allowed to rush the process.”

The time for responding to the new proposal is dangerously short.  The developer’s application consists of 49 separate documents and these require careful and detailed analysis by the community.

It is not clear what rules and criteria ACTPLA will use to assess the developer’s application for reconsideration.  “Nobody can make meaningful comments when the background rules are unknown.  Is this new proposal going to be evaluated against the old precinct code (allowing 2 storeys maximum?) or the draft master plan (2 storeys in one part, and 4 storeys in another?) or the revised master plan (which allows 1 storey in part, and possibly 5 storeys, only under some conditions)?

This new proposal anticipates that the revised Master Plan will be accepted – but the directorate has not yet finished collating all of the comments and other submissions.  The application tries to cherry-pick parts of the existing Territory Plan, Precinct Code, Draft Master Plan and Revised Master Plan while ignoring the planning controls that the community expects to see and ignoring the character of Curtin as an urban village. The final height constraints in the Curtin Master Plan are still unknown and the proposed heights in both the first and revised drafts were strongly contested by the community.

 

Submission on ACT Government Housing Choices Discussion Paper

The Curtin Residents Association has made a submission on the issues and planning aspects of the discussion paper, rather than try to answer the prompt questions. You are welcome to reuse any part of this for your own submission.

Curtin Residents Association Comments on Housing Choices Discussion Paper 2017–18

  1. Open Urban Spaces

It is essential that Urban Open Space between existing suburbs should not be repurposed into housing developments.

While it may be tempting to take Urban Open Space from within suburbs for new housing, this should be a last resort, requiring community agreement and reserved for the types of housing missing in our communities: public housing, co-housing, housing cooperatives, affordable housing, and modest terrace, villa and dual-occupancy housing for people on average incomes. Any such development must have higher social merit than simply densification.

 

  1. Community facilities

It is essential that community facilities such as schools, sporting facilities and vacant spaces in target suburbs (even if they are currently under-utilised) should not be replaced by housing. As densification proceeds in nearby town centres and within suburbs (by redevelopment of existing housing stock) there is already a need for increased community facilities in these suburbs. This increase is necessary to preserve relative levels of amenity for both the existing and the future population. The existing community facility sites should be redeveloped for further community uses, by refurbishing existing buildings or creating new complexes of community facilities and specialised housing, if this can be done with acceptable plot ratios and heights to suit the character of the neighbourhood.

 

  1. Strong data is needed

The current real-life experiment provided by the Mr Fluffy project (that is, relaxing rules in RZ1 to encourage multiple unit construction) provides an opportunity to collect fresh evidence of the effectiveness of these changed constraints, and the choices made by both industry developers and new owners. Only by building a statistically strong collection of data from developments on Mr Fluffy blocks and in RZ2 zones, doing careful analysis, and holding public discussion of the results, can the government build trust in the motivation and likely effectiveness of extending any changes to RZ1 or making changes in RZ2 zone restrictions or areas. Measurement of the effects will make the public debate more informed and meaningful.

 

  1. An area approach to planning

In general the Curtin Residents Association believes that salt-and-pepper sprinkling of multi-unit developments among single residences is desirable, similar to what may be provided by the Mr Fluffy blocks. To achieve best planning outcomes in the long term, it is necessary that a ‘whole of street’, precinct, section or sub-section approach to planning permissions and outcomes must be adopted. This will be more effective than the current paradigm of hoping for good development performance to emerge from having most of the planning rules apply only at the level of individual properties. For example, the express goals for the number of redevelopments and the number of dwellings in particular areas should be stated in advance, to strengthen the notion that planning is goal-directed; and it could be achieved by incentives that change as the density approaches the goal.

A long-term policy of actively encouraging early proposals for suitable developments, with attendant publicity that later development will be restricted, will help to achieve development planning goals faster and more efficiently. This will also reduce the existing residents’ concerns that allowing any development at all will inevitably escalate from this ‘thin end of the wedge’ to over-development and destruction of amenity.

 

  1. Mandating housing diversity

The requirement to provide some smaller housing types should be made a concomitant condition – a social payback – for any large-scale development to be approved. If current development activity is providing the wrong mix of housing types as an outcome, then the government should not rely only on changing the development rules or costs to distort market conditions in its attempt to drive developers to build what they see as less profitable developments. Instead, for example, a developer proposing a development of hundreds of apartments should be required to also propose and complete a specified number of dwellings as townhouses or multi-unit housing, whether in the same precinct or in other areas of Canberra (in similar ways that the provision of social or affordable housing is social policy that should be enforced on developers in all zones). A healthy market in unit development licences may result, as developers negotiate with each other to provide suitable mixtures of dwelling types under each project umbrella. The enforced cross-subsidy will have the result of some sharing of costs to create the outcomes desired by government policy at reasonable cost.

Curtin Residents Association